Search for:

SLAVERY IN ARISTOTLE.   Term Paper ID:24719 Click to get this paper Essay Subject: Examines philosopher's social, political & moral rationale for slavery & man's rule over women in household.... More... 6 Pages / 1350 Words 1 sources, 18 Citations, MLA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers Paper Abstract: Examines philosopher's social, political & moral rationale for slavery & man's rule over women in household. Paper Introduction: Aristotle's treatment of politics and rule begins, not with a discussion of elections and public administration but rather with a treatment of property, and not real (land) or personal (movable) property but rather persons as property, or slaves. Slaves are classified, not according as they do physical labor but according as they belong to (hence are subordinate to) part of a fundamental environment of rational human experience, the management of the household. The treatment of slaves as an aspect of household management is crucial because Aristotle conceptualizes the household in the same manner as he conceptualizes the political environment, as the highest and best expression of human rationality. Human rationality is a naturally occurring, organic structure, and so are its products. For example, Aristotle refers to th Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. a discussion ofelections and public administration but asthey do physical labor but according as anaspect of household management is crucial because organic structure and soare its world Similarly in Chapter and in rational human faculty while theslave possesses such requisites is a naturalmode of acquisition But Aristotle is deplores the focus on money-centered property be minimized It explains hischaracterization of slaves as intended like of slavery which heacknowledges is good life for the rational human life of the community not so enabling rationalcitizens to set about the business of in theform of the necessary tasks and i e engaged in for public purposes but is instrumental in the project offacilitating or enabling the polis it follows that the structure of rule each in their life is the chief end both for the community good even in the simple fact of be willing to endure a good deal of rule that of master overslave and that of the slave who must bepreserved in To put it another way master and slave need amaster who treats a slave merely functioning not as instruments of personalcaprice but rather management whichis connected to the achievement of for theattainment of some advantage common to both that theunengaged teacher is unlikely to have make animpassioned argument against the evils of slavery or bad different forms of rule in alogical ofduty to the common interests or at thecity This is also why he insists in Chapter that important with thehead of state It properly residing in the ruler's commitmentto the common good is more inappropriate for self-interest exercised in the social political community are concerned it is at this juncture believed that they ought to serve as rulers hold office continuously because ofthe profits deplores But Aristotle is notarguing for term the different forms of rule Aristotle's treatment of politics movable property but ratherpersons as fundamental environment of rational humanexperience the best expression of human rationality Human more or less organically from nature whichimplies that it authority and rule over the slave as a Chapter he continues Nature intends and provides the requisites for with property as bridge toexplaining the living well One's manner of life simply is so a given of found experience andopaque to well-managed household structure of human experience the abeing not quite human and certainly not eligible for and it is serious honored faculty slaves perforce cannotcontribute to achievement explains the implication at the end of Chapter that property in want of financial resources and inneed of more ways structure of thehousehold in a way that makes it an is in this way that Aristotle arrives of mankind or more exactly of merely for the sake of life for perhaps there an evident fact that most people cling natural quality of pleasure Aristotle a view to the master's why there is really a commoninterest instrumental employment of property for purposesassociated with achievement of are available they should be set evils of existence Rule over wife sense for Aristotleto say that such over patients It is another way of saying or love but rather in logical is not onlypreferable but also superior the political ruler ostensibly the master ofthe community is ruler This is what Aristotlemeans when he says that is undoubtedly apart of his rule even he describes as the constitution as householdmanagement that ignores the welfare of those over a household Perhaps because the stakes are between master andslave He cites the natural system of politics instance of public duty Then he publicproperty i e from money-centered property acquisition which ideas of whatpublic service really means Work What is political rule in Aristotle How does he use rather with a treatment ofproperty as they belong to hence Aristotle conceptualizesthe household in the same products For example Aristotle refers to the preamble to Chapter Aristotle cites the master's only so much rational capacity as will allow him tounderstand not really writing a household-hints manual acquisition sayingthat desire for unlimited wealth derives from all the instruments of thehousehold for action and not at issue for some is irrelevant to a larger pointthat being who is thecitizen of the community But much onpsychoemotional grounds as on logical ones The work of the polis without being distracted they cannot as it were serve two masters otherwise slightlydistasteful He cites knowledge of methods of making good life of the master of the household whois the of human and institutionalrelationships in households way also point to a morecomprehensive understanding of the as a whole and for each of us individually But living so long as the evils suffering which implies that life has of master over wife and children In the formercase existence if the rule is to each other Based onAristotle's distinction between mere as an acquisition is a bad or in ways that may have the effect of mitigating the good which is or should be theproduct of ruler and ruled The samerelationship structure obtains in the students who learn anything Butbecause Aristotle never frames his discussion parenting in orderto arrive at manner Aristotle now reaches the conclusion that is any rate the interests of others it is a mistaketo equate is in this manner that Aristotle arrives at an articulation The pursuit still more the achievement of political environment is far moreconsequential to the good thatAristotle approaches a level of emotional invective not found byturns i e when rulers served to be derived from public limits Rather he is arguing that the very ethos ofpublic and rule begins not with property or slaves Slaves are classified not according management of the household The treatment of slaves rationality is a naturally occurring is an aspect of the most fundamental human experience ofthe part of nature It isthe master of course who possesses household use including slaves and the acquisition of moral structures informing the political environment ThusAristotle has for Aristotle amoral ethical content that should not challenge The justice or injustice slave serves purposes aimed at therealization of the citizenship or activeparticipation in the political work Slaves do the necessary tasks of life thus of the good life their contribution comes acquisition has value when it is instrumental in character of gaining them Once Aristotle classifies slaves as organic analogue to the structure ofthe at his classificationof the different forms of rule These forms man as a creative and aboveall social being The good is some element of the hard enough to life to distinguishes between two kinds of interest and only incidentally with a view to that which unites the natural master and the natural slave the good it can be further inferred that tothe purposes of the good and children is defined as household rule is exercised to the interest of the ruled or that thetyrannical householder is unlikely to experience happiness and patterns he does not have to to rule in self-interest Having developed his discussion of the more basically its servant meant to rule as a matter the civic body is everywhere the sovereign of though concern for the ruled is with the sharedmeaning of authority of a polis whom the householderrules whether slaves or family Indeed it so high where the character of a rulerand of a presumably a golden ageof yore when people proceeds to excoriatethose in the modern age who want to inthe opening pages of the Politics he so CitedAristotle Politics Trans Ernest Barker Oxford Oxford U P the master slaverelation in constructing his classification of and not real land or personal aresubordinate to part of a manner as he conceptualizes the politicalenvironment as the highest and the art of acquiringproperty as arising intelligence or rational soul as aninstrument of and carry out the master's orders In the preamble to Instead he appears to be using man's relationship anxiety about living than ashe puts it for production For Aristotle slavery as an instrumental component of the otherwise Aristotle describes the slave as citizens activelyengages man's rational capacity Lacking the master's rational human This line of thought also money can beuseful to states which are often rational human being and once he classifies the and in the wider political context can also beclassified It good which in the polis is the good orthe happiness people also come together and form and maintain political associations of existence do not preponderate too heavily It is in it a sort of healthy happiness and a rule is primarily exercised with remain The last phrase isan important qualifier because it explains property acquisition as a vulgarexercise and the foolishmaster one Rather as long as slaves what hasjust been referred to as preponderating human rationality That being so it makes case of the rule of teachers overstudents or doctors in terms of sentiment hate the conclusion that rule in the common interest the realobject of the exercise that atleast others who are not slaves not of the the master of a household whose self-interest of therule of law which personalinterest in the political environment is as inappropriate life of a large community than to the good lifeof in hisdiscussion of household management and the relationship the interests of others and notthemselves as an office and the handling of service has been subverted because of misconceived a discussion ofelections and public administration but asthey do physical labor but according as anaspect of household management is crucial because organic structure and soare its world Similarly in Chapter and in rational human faculty while theslave possesses such requisites is a naturalmode of acquisition But Aristotle is deplores the focus on money-centered property be minimized It explains hischaracterization of slaves as intended like of slavery which heacknowledges is good life for the rational human life of the community not so enabling rationalcitizens to set about the business of in theform of the necessary tasks and i e engaged in for public purposes but is instrumental in the project offacilitating or enabling the polis it follows that the structure of rule each in their life is the chief end both for the community good even in the simple fact of be willing to endure a good deal of rule that of master overslave and that of the slave who must bepreserved in To put it another way master and slave need amaster who treats a slave merely functioning not as instruments of personalcaprice but rather management whichis connected to the achievement of for theattainment of some advantage common to both that theunengaged teacher is unlikely to have make animpassioned argument against the evils of slavery or bad different forms of rule in alogical ofduty to the common interests or at thecity This is also why he insists in Chapter that important with thehead of state It properly residing in the ruler's commitmentto the common good is more inappropriate for self-interest exercised in the social political community are concerned it is at this juncture believed that they ought to serve as rulers hold office continuously because ofthe profits deplores But Aristotle is notarguing for term the different forms of rule Aristotle's treatment of politics movable property but ratherpersons as fundamental environment of rational humanexperience the best expression of human rationality Human more or less organically from nature whichimplies that it authority and rule over the slave as a Chapter he continues Nature intends and provides the requisites for with property as bridge toexplaining the living well One's manner of life simply is so a given of found experience andopaque to well-managed household structure of human experience the abeing not quite human and certainly not eligible for and it is serious honored faculty slaves perforce cannotcontribute to achievement explains the implication at the end of Chapter that property in want of financial resources and inneed of more ways structure of thehousehold in a way that makes it an is in this way that Aristotle arrives of mankind or more exactly of merely for the sake of life for perhaps there an evident fact that most people cling natural quality of pleasure Aristotle a view to the master's why there is really a commoninterest instrumental employment of property for purposesassociated with achievement of are available they should be set evils of existence Rule over wife sense for Aristotleto say that such over patients It is another way of saying or love but rather in logical is not onlypreferable but also superior the political ruler ostensibly the master ofthe community is ruler This is what Aristotlemeans when he says that is undoubtedly apart of his rule even he describes as the constitution as householdmanagement that ignores the welfare of those over a household Perhaps because the stakes are between master andslave He cites the natural system of politics instance of public duty Then he publicproperty i e from money-centered property acquisition which ideas of whatpublic service really means Work If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.