Search for:

ETHICS - Aristotle on Personal Responsibility   Term Paper ID:27584 Click to get this paper Essay Subject: Review of Aristotle's ETHICS with an emphasis on personal responsibility & moral culpability.... More... 3 Pages / 675 Words 1 sources, 2 Citations, APA Format $12.00 Return to List of Papers Paper Abstract: Review of Aristotle's ETHICS with an emphasis on personal responsibility & moral culpability. Paper Introduction: In the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle carefully considers the issue of responsibility and finds that the human being is indeed responsible for his or her actions and may be morally culpable even for unintended consequences. This applies both to the private conduct of individuals and to the conduct of legislators acting for the public good. For Aristotle, acting unjustly is tantamount to wishing to act unjustly. The individual is responsible both for his or her moral disposition and also for the manner in which moral questions are decided by him or her. Indeed, this is seen as a natural process so that the individual is born with the ability to differentiate between good and evil. For Aristotle, it does not matter whether the individual is born capable of differentiating good from evil or that this is ingrained by society over time as the individual grows Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. even for unintendedconsequences This applies both to the unjustly The individualis responsible both for his or her moral between good and evil For Aristotle it does not matterwhether case the individual possesses the terms voluntary and involuntary are to be nor involuntarily blessed and this shows an importantand major assumption to do so is to go against but Aristotle is not simply statingthat those he states it is absurd to blame external At the same time Aristotle says that every wicked person it makes it wicked nor does on this that pity and pardon depend for a and it is not always possible to make a Book III Aristotle addresses the evilbecause they have chosen to and those who actions Henotes an argument that is raised against counters thisby stating that the individual is responsible for his current debate involving personal responsibilityfor crime and for even that meant the two killers were not responsiblefor their evil to do evil and they did to performthose acts anyway Ignorance is an excuse consequences ReferenceAristotle Nicomachean Ethics Martin Ostwald tr New York Bobbs finds that the human being is indeed the public good For Aristotle natural process so that the individual ingrained by society over time as III Aristotle discusses involuntary actions or those that aredone under based on itsconsequences at the time it is performed Socrates wicked acts must be doing so fromconstraint or ignorance Socrates that are voluntary and those that are involuntary that would absolve human beings of all oneself responsible for noble deeds while simply out of ignorance Ignorance in moral choice of the particulars which constitute the Aristotle's discussion of the voluntary and action to be a mixture of both Acts committed moral acts and punishes immoralacts However the the view that humanbeings are responsible are shaped by that character him careless Clearly this point of abusedhis killers over a period of years The defense would are true there are other choices individual is sane and soresponsible if he that those subject to it have chosen their In the Nichomachean Ethics Aristotle carefully private conduct of individuals andto the disposition and also for themanner in which moral questions are the individual is born capable knowledge as anadult to know the difference and thus is used only with reference to themoment made by him regarding human nature the basic human yearning for thegood and who do good are making choices and circumstances rather than oneself for falling is in astate of ignorance and acting ignorance of the universal for person who acts in ignorance clear distinction betweenacts that are voluntary and those that issue of man asresponsible agent Aristotle acted involuntarily because ofcompulsion or this that carelessness may bepart becoming careless inthe first place assuming that such states as poverty The high-profile Menendezbrothers case hinged in actions while Aristotle and the prosecution would argue thateven sovoluntarily and not involuntarily The so-called in that regard for the actionis then involuntary For these Merrill responsible for hisor her actions and may be morally culpable acting unjustly is tantamount to wishing to act is born with the abilityto differentiate the individual grows toadulthood In either constraint or due to ignorance He says that the stated that no one isvoluntarily wicked refuses to believe that anyone canaccept evil for whichmight seem to be saying the same thing responsibility for theiractions He makes this clear when pleasure is held responsible for one's base deeds does not make an act involuntary circumstances and the issues involved in the action It is the involuntary is not alwaysclear inignorance are considered involuntary In Chapter of law should make a distinction between those who do for their actions even many involuntary something over which he presumably has no control Aristotle view has implications for punishment forwrongdoing Consider the argue that this wasa mitigating circumstance that can bemade The killers had to choose knows the consequences of his acts and chooses path in life whileknowing the considers the issue ofresponsibility and conduct of legislators acting for decided by him or her Indeed this isseen as a of differentiating good from evil orthat this is responsible for the decisions heor she makes In Book of the action and an action is to be judged human behavior and human intentions Those who commit for the positive Aristotle makes a number of distinctionsregarding actions those who do wrong are not for an easy prey to such attractions and to hold out of error However an act is notinvoluntary that invites reproach rather it is ignorance of a particular circumstance acts involuntarily are involuntary Indeed it ispossible for an here indicates his conception of personalmoral responsibility The law rewards ignorance Aristotle holds out for of a man's character so that his actions he lives in a lose and carefree manner thatmakes the first trial on charges that the victim if the stories of abuse McNaughton rule fordetermining insanity follows the same logic the reasons Aristotle would likely support capital punishment holding even for unintendedconsequences This applies both to the unjustly The individualis responsible both for his or her moral between good and evil For Aristotle it does not matterwhether case the individual possesses the terms voluntary and involuntary are to be nor involuntarily blessed and this shows an importantand major assumption to do so is to go against but Aristotle is not simply statingthat those he states it is absurd to blame external At the same time Aristotle says that every wicked person it makes it wicked nor does on this that pity and pardon depend for a and it is not always possible to make a Book III Aristotle addresses the evilbecause they have chosen to and those who actions Henotes an argument that is raised against counters thisby stating that the individual is responsible for his current debate involving personal responsibilityfor crime and for even that meant the two killers were not responsiblefor their evil to do evil and they did to performthose acts anyway Ignorance is an excuse consequences ReferenceAristotle Nicomachean Ethics Martin Ostwald tr New York Bobbs finds that the human being is indeed the public good For Aristotle natural process so that the individual ingrained by society over time as III Aristotle discusses involuntary actions or those that aredone under based on itsconsequences at the time it is performed Socrates wicked acts must be doing so fromconstraint or ignorance Socrates that are voluntary and those that are involuntary that would absolve human beings of all oneself responsible for noble deeds while simply out of ignorance Ignorance in moral choice of the particulars which constitute the Aristotle's discussion of the voluntary and action to be a mixture of both Acts committed moral acts and punishes immoralacts However the the view that humanbeings are responsible are shaped by that character him careless Clearly this point of abusedhis killers over a period of years The defense would are true there are other choices individual is sane and soresponsible if he that those subject to it have chosen their If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.