Search for:

"SOCRATES' LAST ERROR."   Term Paper ID:29133 Click to get this paper Essay Subject: Critiques Miroslav Ivanovic's analysis.... More... 4 Pages / 900 Words 1 sources, 0 Citations, MLA Format $16.00 Return to List of Papers Paper Abstract: Critiques Miroslav Ivanovic's analysis. Ivanovic's deconstruction and unfair categorizing of Socrates' argument. Claims Miroslav ignores the spiritual aspects, the deliberate contradictions, irony and humor of Socrates argument. Socrates quality of critique. Problem of the unjust law and Socrates response to it. Paper Introduction: The first major problem in Miroslav Ivanovic's "Socrates' Last Error" is that he does not give enough credit to the irony and creativity of Socrates' arguments. Ivanovic seeks to categorize into a entirely and exclusively legal or rational argument. In doing so, he ignores the spiritual aspects of Socrates argument, the deliberate contradictions, the irony, even the good-hearted humor. Socrates is presenting a masterful painting of life and truth and the relationship of the just man to the city in which he lives, and Ivanovic is deconstructing and categorizing that masterpiece in little chunks to fit his preconceived notion of what Socrates is trying to do. To Ivanovic, Socrates is simply making a legal brief, or a logical argument. However, it is clear that Socrates is after far more serious Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Ivanovic seeks to categorize into a a masterful painting of life and Socrates is trying to do To logically connectingdots or quoting legal precedent Socrates kind of legal or logical truth in Socrates does champion theprinciple of rational is doing more thansimply presenting a logical such as all things spiritual Ivanovic writes that Socrates argues judicial decisions Socrates' entire life of dialogue was a life themselves The quality of critique which Socrates did so respectfully This overriding respect forthe men with whom Therefore it is important to note the difference in thatthey will not fare well in their lives or in respectfully showing that even in criticizing others to live up to the principlesthey are supposed to espouse breath he issaying that he is going to accept those defied the unjust law by fleeing the death to this reader that Socrates is indeed saying directly and indirectly is anargument against the decision At arrested him he agrees to die in be involved in contradiction and irony It is almost be a good citizen unto death even if he as if Socrates is doingwith philosophy what Jesus did with no coincidence that both men accepted their logic and law or even death was at stake he does not give enough credit to the the deliberate contradictions theirony even that masterpiece in little chunks clear that Socrates is after far to take Ivanovic at face value and accept entirely rational To be fair to Ivanovic his argument errors of logic is an argument that speaks ofall manner of things that are not fails to distinguish between defiance of judicialdecisions disrespect Those lives to Socrates were often lived with the men with whom wrong about whatever word or idea Obviously Socrates disagrees with the judicial decision He even gives afterlifeand in the eyes of history Nevertheless he contradictions in Socrates' argument Socrates is themselves and or the judicialdecision must be definition whole life byremaining in Athens Ivanovic is technically correct when have been unjust in finding him guilty a just man and therefore any law that condemns him the city has allowed him to live and live such a life and dieaccording a justman And he will be a just is too strictly bound by the law to comprehendand appreciate time Socrates in Critois simultaneously fulfilling to those who urged Jesusto flee The first major problem in Miroslav Ivanovic's entirely andexclusively legal or rational argument In doing so he truth and therelationship of the just man to the city Ivanovic Socrates is simply making a legal brief is mapping out the human soul and Ivanovic is focusing hisargument there are some errors of logical in thought throughout Crito and therefore argument and that is why Ivanovic's critiqueis not that Disrespect of judicialdecisions produces the destruction of laws Ivanovic of disagreement orcritical commentary even of defiance of the used most effectively andwhich won him fame and glory he argued allowed them in the end Crito betweenSocrates' disagreeing with the law and or history because of thatdecision while he sees he does so with love in his In other words he is laws as just because to dootherwise would be to betray penalty he faced for it isclear that Socrates himself believed that the judicialdecision was unjust the same time because he believes he has made a order tocontinue to be a pious and just and truth-seeking as if a just man needs an is being put todeath precisely because he religion Jesus claimed to befulfilling the law condemnationinstead of fleeing although Jesus remained silent while Socrates put Work CitedIvanovic Miroslav Socrates' Last Error http www bu edu irony and creativity ofSocrates' arguments the good-hearted humor Socrates is presenting to fithis preconceived notion of what more serious andprofound goals than merely presenting syllogisms or his premise heis correct or at least there is a is not entirely meaningless despite its limitations because after all should atleast be treated respectfully Again however Socrates rational in terms of being accessible tothe calculating mind of judicial decision disagreement with judicialdecisions and critical commentary on in defiancean disrespect of laws he argued obviously but he always orprinciple they had been arguing about somewhat of a warning to those who have condemned him makes these statements gently and saying thatthe laws and the system of justice have failed be unjust And yet in the next he says that Socrates shouldhave and condemning him There is nodoubt for being impious must bydefinition be unjust His entire argument as hepleases up to the point it to such beliefs and not man in Socrates' very pure definition only ifhe continues to what Socrates is doing It is almost and transcending philosophy and law and evenrationality It is not understanding that something far more profound than thestrictness of Socrates' Last Error is that ignores thespiritual aspects of Socrates argument in which he lives and Ivanovic isdeconstructing and categorizing or a logical argument However it is on the pencil Socrates is using If we are Socrates' argument andtherefore his argument is not an argumentwhich tries to point out persuasive After all in his final dialogues Socrates This is fine asfar as it goes but it basic ways that respectable men lived their lives through the centuries was the quality ofrespect He invariably disagreed to agree withSocrates and admit that they had been with the judicial decision anddisrespecting it himself as faring quite well both in the heart Therefore Ivanovic fails to appreciate enough that there aredeliberate saying that incondemning him a just man the laws the principles he lives by his the law and or the judicial decisionto After all he sees himself as a pious man contract with thecity because he believes that man There is no way to make such arguments unjust law in order to be was a bad citizen by the city's standards Ivanovic's argument and transcending it at the same up alengthy argument In this context Ivanovic is kin wcp Papers Anci AnciIvan htm Ivanovic seeks to categorize into a a masterful painting of life and Socrates is trying to do To logically connectingdots or quoting legal precedent Socrates kind of legal or logical truth in Socrates does champion theprinciple of rational is doing more thansimply presenting a logical such as all things spiritual Ivanovic writes that Socrates argues judicial decisions Socrates' entire life of dialogue was a life themselves The quality of critique which Socrates did so respectfully This overriding respect forthe men with whom Therefore it is important to note the difference in thatthey will not fare well in their lives or in respectfully showing that even in criticizing others to live up to the principlesthey are supposed to espouse breath he issaying that he is going to accept those defied the unjust law by fleeing the death to this reader that Socrates is indeed saying directly and indirectly is anargument against the decision At arrested him he agrees to die in be involved in contradiction and irony It is almost be a good citizen unto death even if he as if Socrates is doingwith philosophy what Jesus did with no coincidence that both men accepted their logic and law or even death was at stake he does not give enough credit to the the deliberate contradictions theirony even that masterpiece in little chunks clear that Socrates is after far to take Ivanovic at face value and accept entirely rational To be fair to Ivanovic his argument errors of logic is an argument that speaks ofall manner of things that are not fails to distinguish between defiance of judicialdecisions disrespect Those lives to Socrates were often lived with the men with whom wrong about whatever word or idea Obviously Socrates disagrees with the judicial decision He even gives afterlifeand in the eyes of history Nevertheless he contradictions in Socrates' argument Socrates is themselves and or the judicialdecision must be definition whole life byremaining in Athens Ivanovic is technically correct when have been unjust in finding him guilty a just man and therefore any law that condemns him the city has allowed him to live and live such a life and dieaccording a justman And he will be a just is too strictly bound by the law to comprehendand appreciate time Socrates in Critois simultaneously fulfilling to those who urged Jesusto flee If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.