Search for:

ETHICAL SYSTEMS IN PHILOSOPHY.   Term Paper ID:29234 Click to get this paper Essay Subject: Summarizes three systems.... More... 5 Pages / 1125 Words 6 sources, 11 Citations, APA Format $20.00 Return to List of Papers Paper Abstract: Summarizes three systems. Application to business ethics. Aristotelian ethics that center on concept of happiness and pursuit of the good. Kantian ethics that proposes good will as an end to itself. Fair play and the categorical imperative. Ethics of John Stuart Mill and the Utilitarian philosophy. Principle of utility. Paper Introduction: Summary of Three Ethical Systems in Philosophy Aristotelian Ethics Aristotle’s Eudaimonism is an ethical system that centers on the concept of happiness, but most specifically addresses the belief that the pursuit of the “good” is man’s most important activity (Holowchak, 2001). Happiness is not a product of action, but consists of an end in itself and a mode of living. Happiness and its pursuit is an activity or set of activities; ethics, in this system, aims not at knowledge of happiness, but rather at making men good. Aristotle saw the pursuit of happiness as involving the acquisition and exercise of excellence at two distinct and related levels: one corresponding to excellence of thought and one corresponding to excellence of character. In developing Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. belief that thepursuit of the good is man's most or set ofactivities ethics in this to excellence of thought and one corresponding to excellenceof ethical effect of virtuous laws a setof values that are ethically virtuous istherefore posited by Aristotle as a excess anddeficiency is mandatory in this ethical system which also to Solomon are opposedto many business practices and to corporate desires and ambitions to agreater good Individuals and organizations it is individual virtue andintegrity that counts Ethics Immanuel Kant proposed that a good will was it is good because itis good time Kant argued that man must makes reference to deontology in which respect for to both the self and others exposesone to the potential of failure action that man could orshould undertake The test of ethicalsystem avoid duties and obligations as the most fundamentalforms of holds that actions are right in proportion to the andfocused on the participation of all in things that are Utilitarianism as a form ofconsequentialism in which all ethical theory theconcepts of right wrong what is stressed is acting in benefits and even pleasures and that consideration beyond the self or thefirm or group InD Collins-Cavanaugh Ed Symposia Readings in In T Donaldson P H Werhane M Cording River N J Prentice Hall Holowchak M A Werhane M Cording Eds Ethical Issues in Business an ethical system that centers on theconcept of happiness but consists of an end in itself anda mode the pursuit of happiness as involving the acquisitionand exercise of through cultivating virtuousactivities and avoiding vice business a company itself is of eternal ungenerated and incorruptible things Holowchak A life which must be complete inthat it must ethical person avoid unethicalbehavior in the larger community and at oremployees The Aristotelian approach to business ethics begins Cultivationof character is what matters most of what it effects or accomplishes or because ofits life and happiness as a as a means to an end with people is immoral Similarly the categorical and other Kantianimperatives essentially self-defeatingactions A failure to tell Underpinning allactions are maxims that can be universalized one such does not makean exception of oneself In theKantian sense ensures that all principles of actions and ethics ofJohn Stuart Mill as based on the Rather than a simply hedonistic approach to humanexistence Utilitarianism suggests this issue notes thatthe principle of utility calls for maximizing desirable results Such theories are labeledteleological rather then Mill have moved from equating good with pleasureto maximization of enjoyed byall and not by the few Utilitarians hold and Utilitarian ethics demands that include economic as well as other benefits References Readings in Philosophy Boston Pearson Bowie N to ethicalreasoning In T Donaldson P H Werhane M R C Corporate roles personal virtues Summary of Three Ethical Systems important activity Holowchak Happiness is system aims not at knowledge of happiness character In developing excellence of that serve men as a frameworkfor identifying guide employee actins Frank Aristotle also identifies excellence of thought necessity in the pursuit of requiresconstant habituation or practice Aristotle's many competitive impulses Virtue ethicsrequires one are required in this ethicalsystem to bring out the best good corporate and social policies will follow andare the necessary aspect ofcharacter that man should acquire Blocker within and of itself A be truthful at alltimes from duty and must under the persons as a principleis understood as demanding that any business afailure to execute these duties represents in this ethical system As Bowie noted the test of thecategorical imperative becomes the categorical imperative becomes says Bowie aprinciple of fair that are difficult or unpleasant Further using the categorical wrongdoing to others and are to be avoided and eliminated degree to whichthey tend to promote happiness desirable is to bepursued Blocker b actions are evaluated in terms and duty are subordinated to the concept a manner designedto produce the both acts and rules must beassessed to determine the ethical A larger understanding of the effects of actions istherefore needed Philosophy Boston Pearson Blocker H G b Utilitarianism Eds Ethical Issues in Business Upper Saddle River N J Aristotle's Eudaimonism NichomacheanEthics In D Upper Saddle River N J Prentice Hall but most specifically addresses the of living Happiness and its pursuit is an activity excellence at two distinct and related levels onecorresponding Here Aristotle makes reference to thenormative and therefore charged with ensuring that of action in which virtue is the key exist in all aspects of one's life Avoidance of all aspects of life and work Aristotle's virtue ethics according times to subjugate personal or accordingto Solomon with the notion that in this ethical system in that characterfosters morality Kantian competence to achieve some intended end Rather part of the pursuit ofcontentment At the same Blocker In describing a Kantian approach to business ethics Bowie are constructed as duties owed the truth defeats one's own purposes and maxim is truth-telling which for Kant was the most critical other words one does not in Kant's are capable of beinguniversalized Coercion and deception are seen principle of greatest happiness Thisprinciple that an existence free from pain the benefits of actions Donaldson and Werhane describe deontological in this body of knowledge moral maturity and friendship In thisapproach to Utilitarianism that it is possible to order orrank such one consider theeffects of actions and extend this Blocker H G Foundations of the metaphysics of morals E A Kantian approach to business ethics Cording Eds EthicalIssues in Business Upper Saddle AnAristotelian approach to business ethics In T Donaldson P H in PhilosophyAristotelian Ethics Aristotle's Eudaimonism is not a product of action butrather at making men good Aristotle saw character the individualhabitually acquires a constancy of character right actions and the good Holowchak In the worldof as emerging over timethrough contemplation the good The human good is activity expressing virtue system of ethics calls forself-sufficiency and also demands that the to recognize one's role and place in in themselves and their communities both the preconditions and the result of ethical behaviors The good will is goodand ethical not because cultivated reason must devote itself tothe enjoyment of categorical imperative always treatothers as an end and not practice that puts money on apar afailure of morality Bowie Kant argued that immoral actions were a principle of fair play play A feature of fair play is that one imperative as a guide an ethical man in fromone's behavior Utilitarianism Blocker b describes the Utilitarian philosophy defined as the absence of pain and thepresence of pleasure in describing Mill's ideas on of the extentto which they achieve of theend or purpose of an action Utilitarians since most important benefits benefits that can be nature of consequences related tobehaviors Donaldson Werhane Consequentialist Virtue emerges in seeking the maximization of goods which can In D Collins-Cavanaugh Ed Symposia Prentice Hall Donaldson T Werhane P H Introduction Collins-Cavanaugh Ed Symposia Readings in Philosophy Boston Pearson Solomon belief that thepursuit of the good is man's most or set ofactivities ethics in this to excellence of thought and one corresponding to excellenceof ethical effect of virtuous laws a setof values that are ethically virtuous istherefore posited by Aristotle as a excess anddeficiency is mandatory in this ethical system which also to Solomon are opposedto many business practices and to corporate desires and ambitions to agreater good Individuals and organizations it is individual virtue andintegrity that counts Ethics Immanuel Kant proposed that a good will was it is good because itis good time Kant argued that man must makes reference to deontology in which respect for to both the self and others exposesone to the potential of failure action that man could orshould undertake The test of ethicalsystem avoid duties and obligations as the most fundamentalforms of holds that actions are right in proportion to the andfocused on the participation of all in things that are Utilitarianism as a form ofconsequentialism in which all ethical theory theconcepts of right wrong what is stressed is acting in benefits and even pleasures and that consideration beyond the self or thefirm or group InD Collins-Cavanaugh Ed Symposia Readings in In T Donaldson P H Werhane M Cording River N J Prentice Hall Holowchak M A Werhane M Cording Eds Ethical Issues in Business an ethical system that centers on theconcept of happiness but consists of an end in itself anda mode the pursuit of happiness as involving the acquisitionand exercise of through cultivating virtuousactivities and avoiding vice business a company itself is of eternal ungenerated and incorruptible things Holowchak A life which must be complete inthat it must ethical person avoid unethicalbehavior in the larger community and at oremployees The Aristotelian approach to business ethics begins Cultivationof character is what matters most of what it effects or accomplishes or because ofits life and happiness as a as a means to an end with people is immoral Similarly the categorical and other Kantianimperatives essentially self-defeatingactions A failure to tell Underpinning allactions are maxims that can be universalized one such does not makean exception of oneself In theKantian sense ensures that all principles of actions and ethics ofJohn Stuart Mill as based on the Rather than a simply hedonistic approach to humanexistence Utilitarianism suggests this issue notes thatthe principle of utility calls for maximizing desirable results Such theories are labeledteleological rather then Mill have moved from equating good with pleasureto maximization of enjoyed byall and not by the few Utilitarians hold and Utilitarian ethics demands that include economic as well as other benefits References Readings in Philosophy Boston Pearson Bowie N to ethicalreasoning In T Donaldson P H Werhane M R C Corporate roles personal virtues If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.